Legal philosophers make a number of bold, contentious claims about the nature of law. For instance, some claim that law necessarily involves coercion, while others disagree. Some claim that all law enjoys presumptive moral validity, while others disagree. We can see these claims in at least three, mutually exclusive ways: (1) We can see them as descriptions of law's nature (descriptivism), (2) we can see them as expressing non-descriptive attitudes of the legal philosophers in question (expressivism), or (3) we can see them as practical claims about how we should view law or order our society (pragmatism). This paper argues that we should understand these claims in the pragmatist way, as claims about how we should view law or order society.
Law, Law & ethics, Expressivism (Ethics), Pragmatism, Philosophy of law, Sociological jurisprudence, Duress (Law)
Date of Authorship for this Version
Donelson, Raff, "Describing Law" (2020). Journal Articles. 432.
33 Can. J. L. & Jurisprudence 85 (2020)